2013/2/7 Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com>: > On 2013-02-06 13:25:31 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: >> Mind you, when I explained our current CF review workflow for the SF >> ReviewFest last year, the attendees thought I was insane. It's kept me >> from doing more reviewfests. Our current workflow and tooling is >> definitely a serious obstacle to gettng more reviewers. Seems like a >> good topic for the developer meeting. > > I personally feel that the CF process isn't limited by technicalities > like the commitfest UI or by the lack of random reviewers. Its limited > by the amount of available reviewer time of people with in-depth > knowledge of pg and committer bandwith. > Trying to solve that problem via technical means doesn't seem likely to > work out very well.
+1 Pavel > >> >> The existing Gerrit community would be keen to have the PostgreSQL >> >> project as a major user, though, and would theoretically help with >> >> modification needs. Current major users are OpenStack, Mediawiki, >> >> LibreOffice and QT. > > There's also android as a rather major user... > >> > I just took a quick look at their system, and when they start talking >> > about requirements in the 100's of Gb of RAM, 24 core machines and >> > SSD, I get scared :) But that's to "scale" it - doesn't mention when >> > you need to do anything like that. I'm assuming we'd be tiny. > > Well, with gerrit you do far more work inside the application in > comparison to what we are doing today in the CF app, so part of this > probably is just that more work is running through it... > > Greetings, > > Andres Freund > > -- > Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ > PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
