Tom Lane escribió:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > xid = HeapTupleHeaderGetRawXmax(tuple);
> > ! if (((tuple->t_infomask & HEAP_XMAX_IS_MULTI) &&
> > ! MultiXactIdIsValid(xid) &&
> > ! MultiXactIdPrecedes(xid, cutoff_multi)) ||
> > ! ((!(tuple->t_infomask & HEAP_XMAX_IS_MULTI)) &&
> > ! TransactionIdIsNormal(xid) &&
> > ! TransactionIdPrecedes(xid, cutoff_xid)))
> > {
>
> Would this be clearer as a ternary expression? That is,
>
> if ((tuple->t_infomask & HEAP_XMAX_IS_MULTI) ?
> (MultiXactIdIsValid(xid) &&
> MultiXactIdPrecedes(xid, cutoff_multi)) :
> (TransactionIdIsNormal(xid) &&
> TransactionIdPrecedes(xid, cutoff_xid)))
Ah, yes, by far. Thanks, I pushed that way.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
