Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > On 02/08/2013 12:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > >Over in Fedora-land they're trying to institute support for ARM64, > >which among other things means autoconf 2.69 or later: > >http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-February/178273.html > > Is there any good reason not to move to whatever the latest and > greatest is? 2.69 does seem pretty new - even Fedora 17 only comes > with 2.68.
Considering that only a handful of people need the specific required autoconf version, I don't think it's a problem to migrate to the latest and greatest. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
