On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Phil Sorber <p...@omniti.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> No maybe. But I think that all the client commands should follow the >> same rule. Otherwise a user would get confused when specifying >> options. > > I would consider the rest of the apps using it as a consensus. I will > make sure it aligns in behavior. >
I've done as you suggested, and made sure they align with other command line utils. What I have found is that dbname is passed (almost) last in the param array so that it clobbers all previous values. I have made this patch as minimal as possible basing it off of master and not off of my previous attempt. For the record I still like the overall design of my previous attempt better, but I have not included a new version based on that here so as not to confuse the issue, however I would gladly do so upon request. Updated patch attached. >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> Fujii Masao
pg_isready_con_str_v4.diff
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
