Lamar Owen wrote: > On Tuesday 27 August 2002 03:43 pm, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Lamar Owen wrote: > > > On Tuesday 27 August 2002 03:19 pm, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > I thought it WAS resolved, to do: > > > > > Tom likes this because it is the fewer global users who have to append > > > > the '@'. > > > > At least that was my perception of the uneasy consensus reached. > > > OK, you have now split the vote because we have two for the change, and > > two against. Why do you prefer to tag the globals? Is it Tom's > > argument? I think it is kind of strange to tag the globals when it is > > the locals who have @ in their username, and when they do: > > I agree with what Tom said, and understand why he said it. And I thought you > did, too -- I have apparently misunderstood (again!) the issue.
I try not to interject my opinions into emails where I am asking for disucsion so people can more clearly see the options and vote accordingly. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
