> I thought it was a useful idea anyway, but I could see his point. This > should probably move to "Waiting on Author" when it happens, presuming > that the person who wrote something is motivated to see the change > committed. (If they weren't, why did they write it?)
Except that the implication of "waiting on author" is that, if there's no updates in a couple weeks, we bounce it. And the author doesn't necessarily control a bikeshedding discussion about syntax, for example. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
