On 03-03-2013 21:27, Josh Berkus wrote: > I think it would be worth talking about when someone wants to implement > it. I'd imagine it would require setting a GUC, though, which would be > off by default for obvious reasosn. > -1. Why not adding another storage_parameter, say auto_refresh=on? Also, that's another feature.
> And of limited utility, as mentioned. > For a first release, that is fine as is. Let's not complicate a feature that has been widely discussed in this development cycle. -- Euler Taveira de Oliveira - Timbira http://www.timbira.com.br/ PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
