Neil Conway wrote: > Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > More generally, though, I was thinking that the appropriate answer > > at this point is to rip out support for version-0 authentication > > altogether. I can't believe anyone will be trying to connect to a > > 7.3 or beyond server with 6.2 client libraries (v0 went away in 6.3 > > as best I can tell from the CVS logs). > > Further, has this code actually been tested within recent memory? If > not, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that it's suffered some > bitrot... > > > Anyone want to argue that we should keep the v0 protocol support any > > longer? > > Nope, exactly the same thought crossed my mind while I was reading > through the code...
Feel free to rip it out. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
