On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 05:08:26PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Another point worth considering is that most of this is duplicated by > ecpg's libpgtypes. Do we want to fix that one too, or do we just let it > continue to be broken? I note that other bugs are already unfixed in > ecpg's copy. One other idea to consider is moving these things to
Meaning that a fix wasn't put there, too? > But in light of this bug and other already fixed date/time bugs, perhaps > it's warranted? Opinions please. I'd love to go to a single source. Most of libpgtypes was taken from the backend back when it was developed. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org Jabber: michael.meskes at gmail dot com VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
