On Mar 7, 2013, at 7:55 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgri...@ymail.com> wrote:
>> If the answer to both those questions is “yes,” I think the term >> should remain “table,” with a few mentions that the term includes >> materialized views (and excludes foreign tables). > > And if the answers are "not exactly" and "yes"? I still tend to think that the term should remain “table,” with brief mentions at the top of pages when the term should be assumed to represent tables and matviews, and otherwise required disambiguations. Trying to make the least possible work for you here. :-) David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
