I wrote: > ... So I think this patch is missing a bet by not > accepting equal() expressions.
I've committed this with that logic, a comment explaining exactly why
this is the way to do it, and some other cosmetic improvements.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
