Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > I could also live with keeping the schema column as proposed, if people > think it has a use, but letting it be redundant with a schema name > included in the identity string. But it seems like a bad idea to try to > shear schema off of identity.
+1 Use case for keeping the extra column: replication to a federated database where you want to tweak the target schema. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
