On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> And we definitely looked at ARC > > We didn't just look at it. At least one release used it. Then patent > issues were raised (and I think the implementation had some contention > problems). > > > -- > greg
What is the general thinking? Is it time to start testing again and thinking about improvements to the current algorithm? Regards, Atri -- Regards, Atri l'apprenant -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
