Thanks - I've added it here: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1096 .
I've also attached a revised version that makes IGNORE and RESPECT UNRESERVED keywords (following the pattern of NULLS_FIRST and NULLS_LAST). Nick On 23 March 2013 14:34, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Nicholas White <n.j.wh...@gmail.com> writes: > > The SQL standard defines a RESPECT NULLS or IGNORE NULLS option for lead, > > lag, [...]. This is not implemented in PostgreSQL > > (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/functions-window.html) > > I've had a go at implementing this, and I've attached the resulting > patch. > > It's not finished yet, but I was hoping to find out if my solution is > along > > the right lines. > > Since we're trying to get 9.3 to closure, this patch probably isn't > going to get much attention until the 9.4 development cycle starts > (in a couple of months, likely). In the meantime, please add it to > the next commitfest list so we remember to come back to it: > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=18 > > One comment just from a quick eyeball look is that we really hate > adding new keywords that aren't UNRESERVED, because that risks > breaking existing applications. Please see if you can refactor the > grammar to make those new entries unreserved. > > regards, tom lane >
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers