On 2013-03-28 10:18:45 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Since we call relation_open() with lockmode, ISTM that we should also call > > relation_close() with the same lockmode instead of NoLock. No? > > > Agreed on that.
That doesn't really hold true generally, its often sensible to hold the lock till the end of the transaction, which is what not specifying a lock at close implies. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
