On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 01:56:50PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: > On 29 March 2013 13:24, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >> > >> On 29 March 2013 01:17, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> > >> > wrote: > >> Early discussions had difficulties because of the lack of config > >> directories, include_if_exists and this patch. We now have the > >> technical capability to meet every request. Circumstances have changed > >> and outcomes may change also. > > > > Thanks for the clarifications. The following questions are still unanswered: > > Minor points only. We can implement this differently if you have > alternate proposals.
Seems we are doing design on this long after the final 9.3 commit fest should have closed. I think we need to punt this to 9.4. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
