On Apr 1, 2013, at 4:59 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think the only people for whom nothing will break are the people who > aren't using arrays in the first place. Anyone who is is likely to > have dependencies on the way array_lower/upper work today. Well, what if we add new functions that return 0 for empty arrays, but leave the existing ones alone? Perhaps call them array_size(), array_first_index(), and array_last_index(). Then nothing has to break, and we can decide independently if we want to deprecate the older functions in a future release. Or not. Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
