Re: [HACKERS] commit dfda6ebaec67 versus wal_keep_segments

[Jeff Janes]

On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:

> This commit introduced a problem with wal_keep_segments:
>
> commit dfda6ebaec6763090fb78b458a979b558c50b39b
>


The problem seems to be that the underflow warned about is happening,
because the check to guard it was checking the wrong thing.  However, I
don't really understand KeepLogSeg.  It seems like segno, and hence recptr,
don't actually serve any purpose.

Cheers,

Jeff

diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index 2f9209f..3643be8 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -8264,7 +8264,7 @@ KeepLogSeg(XLogRecPtr recptr, XLogSegNo *logSegNo)
        XLByteToSeg(recptr, segno);

        /* avoid underflow, don't go below 1 */
-       if (segno <= wal_keep_segments)
+       if (*logSegNo <= wal_keep_segments)
                segno = 1;
        else
                segno = *logSegNo - wal_keep_segments;