Hi, I though we were more specific about an extension's object itself not living in a schema in our documentation, but I agree we still have room for progress here.
"David E. Wheeler" <da...@justatheory.com> writes: > + Note that only the extension objects will be placed into the named > + schema; the extension itself is a database-global object. I think you're patching the right place, but I'm not sure about the term "database-global object", that I can't find by grepping in sgml/ref. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
