Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote: > My opinion is that we don't need to be perfect as long as we > catch 99% of random errors and we don't have any major blind > spots.
+1 > Also, the first version doesn't necessarily need to perform well; > we can leave optimization as future work. +1, as long as we don't slow down instances not using the feature, and we don't paint ourselves into a corner. > We're not really trying to catch memory errors anyway. +1 -- Kevin Grittner EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
