On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Hm, I see 4 places in HEAD. But in any case, is
My mistake. I had REL9_2_STABLE checked out. > int16 values[1]; /* VARIABLE LENGTH ARRAY */ > } int2vector; /* VARIABLE LENGTH STRUCT */ > > really better than > > int16 values[FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER]; > } int2vector; > > ? I don't think so. I can see your point. Now that I look at the comments beside FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER, I see that indeed, as I suspected, the Microsoft flexible array members are not completely compatible with C99 style flexible arrays, so this may be the least-worst option. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
