On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 11:01 +0300, Ants Aasma wrote:
> I think we should first deal with using it for page checksums and if
> future versions want to reuse some of the code for WAL checksums then
> we can rearrange the code.

Sounds good to me, although I expect we at least want any assembly to be
in a separate file (if the specialization makes it in 9.3).

        Jeff Davis

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to