On 11 April 2013 00:37, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Andres Freund <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I feel pretty strongly that we shouldn't add any such complications to > > XLogInsert() itself, its complicated enough already and it should be > > made simpler, not more complicated. > > +1, emphatically. XLogInsert is a really nasty scalability > bottleneck. We need to move as much logic out of that function as > possible, and particularly out from under WALInsertLock. >
Andres' patch was applied, so not sure what you mean by +1ing a comment made in relation to that patch. I'm aware that WALInsertLock is a bottleneck and am not going to be making that worse. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
