2013/4/12 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>: > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Robert Haas escribió: >>> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Kohei KaiGai <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote: >> >>> > Also, the attached function-execute-permission patch is a rebased >>> > version. I rethought its event name should be OAT_FUNCTION_EXECUTE, >>> > rather than OAT_FUNCTION_EXEC according to the manner without >>> > abbreviation. Other portion is same as previous ones. >>> >>> Great. This looks fine to me, committed. I also committed your >>> getObjectIdentity patch, which caused some regression test output >>> changes. I applied the necessary correction before committing, I >>> think, but please check. >> >> I think the function-execute code path is still using >> getObjectDescription rather than identity. > > Yeah, I think so. KaiGai, can you provide a follow-on patch to fix that? > Yes, of course. The attached one replaces the getObjectDescription in sepgsql/proc.c, and relative changes in regression test.
Thanks, -- KaiGai Kohei <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp>
sepgsql-v9.3-replace-get-object-description.v2.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
