On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > OTOH, the notion that a UUID generator doesn't touch *any* database > state seems like it might be worth treating as a general function > property: it's simple to understand and applies to a lot of other > volatile functions such as random() and clock_timestamp(). >
Something like the NO SQL access indication mandated by sql standard? http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1267473390.7837.9.ca...@vanquo.pezone.net -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación Phone: +593 4 5107566 Cell: +593 987171157 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
