On 27 April 2013 20:23, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> 2. The checksum algorithm business. Again, we don't get to tinker with >> that anymore once we're in beta. > > I think it's pretty darn clear that we should change the algorithm, > and I think we've got a patch to do that. So we should be able to > resolve this relatively quickly. I'll be working on this today. > But +1 for adding a checksum > algorithm ID to pg_control anyway. Yes, seems best. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
