On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 14:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Yeah, this is not tolerable. We could think about improving the logic > to have a stronger check on whether the old server is really there or > not (ie it should be doing something more like pg_ping and less like > just checking if the pidfile is there). But given how close we are to > beta, maybe the best thing is to revert that change for now and put it > back on the to-think-about-for-9.4 list. Peter?
Reverted. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
