Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Ah. Tom already fixed the problem in > 5194024d72f33fb209e10f9ab0ada7cc67df45b7. I was working in a > branch based on 3ccae48f44d993351e1f881761bd6c556ebd6638 and it > failed there.
Since previous regression tests missed this bug, I've added the test you posted, to make sure it doesn't come back unnoticed. Thanks for the test case! -- Kevin Grittner EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
