On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:55 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Seems like this might be a good idea to avoid the type of failure > exhibited in bug #8128. We don't care too much about the readability > of the dump script created during an upgrade, so it's hard to see a > downside.
Huh. I thought you were talking about quoting identifiers in an SQL dump. But you're not, you're talking about quoting identifiers in sql being sent to the server during the pg_dump process. Why did pg_dump ever not quote all such identifiers? -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
