On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 02:27:18PM -0400, Evan D. Hoffman wrote:
> If you want to start the old cluster, you will need to remove
> the ".old" suffix from /var/lib/pgsql/9.1/data/global/pg_control.old.
> Because "link" mode was used, the old cluster cannot be safely
> started once the new cluster has been started.
>
> Linking user relation files
> /var/lib/pgsql/9.1/data/base/16406/3016054
> Mismatch of relation OID in database "dbname": old OID 2938685, new OID 299721
> Failure, exiting
[ Moved to hackers ]
OK, that is odd. We preserve old/new OIDs, (not relfilenode, as someone
suggested in this thread); FYI:
* FYI, while pg_class.oid and pg_class.relfilenode are initially the same
* in a cluster, but they can diverge due to CLUSTER, REINDEX, or VACUUM
* FULL. The new cluster will have matching pg_class.oid and
* pg_class.relfilenode values and be based on the old oid value. This can
* cause the old and new pg_class.relfilenode values to differ. In summary,
* old and new pg_class.oid and new pg_class.relfilenode will have the
* same value, and old pg_class.relfilenode might differ.
The problem reported is that pg_dump was not able to preserve the
old/new oids between clusters. Can you get the answer for this query on
the old cluster:
SELECT relname from pg_class where oid = 2938685;
and on the new cluster, assuming you used 'copy' mode so you can start
the old/new clusters indepdendently:
SELECT relname from pg_class where oid = 299721;
I think we will find that there is something in pg_dump related to this
table that isn't preserving the oids.
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
