Robert Haas escribió:
> I think this patch as currently written is going to leave us with the
> following dubious-looking construct.
>
> if (!ConditionalLockBufferForCleanup(buf))
> {
> if (!ConditionalLockBufferForCleanup(buf))
> {
>
> Modulo that minor gripe, I think it's definitely worth doing this in
> master. I'm a bit disinclined to change the message string in 9.2,
> and therefore might not back-patch at all, since there's basically no
> consequence to this except for mildly inaccurate reporting. But if
> people feel it's worth a translation break for this, I don't object to
> back-patching it either.
We break translations to fix bugs from time to time. Translators do
update for minor releases, so if this is the only consideration, I don't
think we should hold this bugfix for it (or any other, IMV).
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
