> diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in > index 4ea5699..ff8470e 100644 > --- a/configure.in > +++ b/configure.in > @@ -1445,17 +1445,6 @@ fi > AC_CHECK_FUNCS([strtoll strtoq], [break]) > AC_CHECK_FUNCS([strtoull strtouq], [break]) > > -AC_CACHE_CHECK([for builtin locking functions], pgac_cv_gcc_int_atomics, > -[AC_TRY_LINK([], > - [int lock = 0; > - __sync_lock_test_and_set(&lock, 1); > - __sync_lock_release(&lock);], > - [pgac_cv_gcc_int_atomics="yes"], > - [pgac_cv_gcc_int_atomics="no"])]) > -if test x"$pgac_cv_gcc_int_atomics" = x"yes"; then > - AC_DEFINE(HAVE_GCC_INT_ATOMICS, 1, [Define to 1 if you have > __sync_lock_test_and_set(int *) and friends.]) > -fi > -
Careful here --- s_lock.h has some code conditional on HAVE_GCC_INT_ATOMICS which your patch is not touching, yet it is removing the definition, unless I'm misreading. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
