> Actually, Linux Journal (and their editors) are fans of PostgreSQL. > > This year, MySQL may actually have clued in to transactions and a few > other big database features. I don't know that they actually *have* > these features polished up, but LJ is giving them credit for trying...
It still disturbs me that you have to use a non-standard table type to support transactions, plus the hijinks that will occur when you attempt to perform a transaction that involves changes to transactional and non-transactional tables... "If you do a ROLLBACK when you have updated a non-transactional table you will get an error (ER_WARNING_NOT_COMPLETE_ROLLBACK) as a warning. All transactional safe tables will be restored but any non-transactional table will not change." Chris ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
