On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 04:33:50PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > This would also be the first step in allowing the clog to grow > larger than 2 billion transactions, eliminating the need for > anti-wraparound freezing altogether. You'd still want to truncate > the clog eventually, but it would be nice to not be pressed against > the wall with "run vacuum freeze now, or the system will shut down".
Keep in mind that autovacuum_freeze_max_age is 200M to allow faster clog truncation. Does this help that? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
