Tom Lane writes: > Perhaps there's a case for prohibiting volatile casts (as opposed to > stable ones), but I don't really see it. I'd prefer to just remove > this restriction. Comments?
I'm not wedded to it, I just modelled it after the SQL standard, but evidently the volatility levels are different in detail. I would disallow volatile casts in any case. There ought to be a minimal behavioral contract between creators and users of types. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
