On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > That's not a bad technique. I wonder how reliable it would be in > postgres. Do all filesystems allow a rename() to succeed if there isn't > actually any space left? E.g. on btrfs I wouldn't be sure. We need to > rename because WAL files need to be named after the LSN timelineid...
I suppose we could just always do the rename at the same time as setting up the current log file. That is, when we start wal log x also set up wal file x+1 at that time. This isn't actually guaranteed to be enough btw. It's possible that the record we're actively about to write will require all of both those files... But that should be very unlikely. -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
