Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>> Essentially the argument for allowing this without a permissions check
>> is "I'm not really doing anything to the schema, just preconfiguring the
>> rights that will be attached to a new object if I later (successfully)
>> create one in this schema".

> Makes sense to me; if we were going to do something, I'd say a warning
> would be better, but I'm alright with nothing too.

Hm.  Throwing a NOTICE saying "btw, this won't be of any value until the
user has CREATE rights in that schema" might be a reasonable compromise.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to