Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes: > * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: >> Essentially the argument for allowing this without a permissions check >> is "I'm not really doing anything to the schema, just preconfiguring the >> rights that will be attached to a new object if I later (successfully) >> create one in this schema".
> Makes sense to me; if we were going to do something, I'd say a warning > would be better, but I'm alright with nothing too. Hm. Throwing a NOTICE saying "btw, this won't be of any value until the user has CREATE rights in that schema" might be a reasonable compromise. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers