On 9 June 2013 14:59, Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> AFAICS there are weird cases where changing the way FKs execute will >> change the way complex trigger applications will execute. I don't see >> a way to avoid that other than "do nothing". Currently, we execute the >> checks following the normal order of execution rules for triggers. >> Every idea we've had so far changes that in some way; variously in >> major or minor ways, but changed nonetheless. > > The obvious case to handle would be if someone has a trigger to > automatically create any missing references.
Exactly my thoughts. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
