* Pavel Stehule (pavel.steh...@gmail.com) wrote: > 2013/6/11 Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net>: > > And this still has next-to-nothing to do with the specific proposal that > > was put forward. > > > > I'd like actual procedures too, but it's a completely different and > > distinct thing from making DO blocks able to return something. > > I think so it is related - we talk about future form of DO statement - > or about future form of server side scripting.
I don't believe there's any intent to ever have DO used for stored
procedures. Not only are stored procedures deserving of their own
top-level command (eg: CALL, as has been discussed before..), but I
believe they would necessairly have different enough semantics that
shoe-horning them into DO would end up breaking backwards compatibility.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
