On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > That idea is not dependent upon CSNs. > > It is an option for us to implement snapshot synchronisation now, we > just haven't done it yet. > > I'm currently working on exporting/importing snapshots on standbys, > which is a precursor to that idea. > > None of the above is any easier/harder with CSNs, nor would it > delay/accelerate delivery of such features.
I agree that snapshot synchronization can be done with or without CSNs, but surely synchronizing a single monotonically increasing number is easier than synchronizing lists of running transactions. Regards, Ants Aasma -- Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH Gröhrmühlgasse 26 A-2700 Wiener Neustadt Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
