On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Yep, this is where we are stuck; having an index span multiple tables > in some way.
Or implementing it by keeping all data in the table in which it was declared. (I.e., supertable holds all rows; subtable holds only the primary key and those columns of the row that are not in the supertable.) >From looking at the various discussions of this in books, and what it appears to me that the SQL standard says, it seems that their overall vision of table inheritance is to be consistent with the implementation that I described above. cjs -- Curt Sampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
