On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:44:53PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 12:32 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > The CF app was and is specifically for dealing with CFs. Having it > > deal with backpatches makes it, well, a bugtracker. It's not meant to > > be that. If we want a bugtracker, then it has very different > > requirements. > > It's not in evidence that the requirements are different. The CF app is > basically a list of lists of patches with date information and > associated person's names. Tracking backpatch candidates doesn't sound > that much different. (That said, I'm not convinced backpatches need any > tracking at all, but if they did, I think the CF app would be just > fine.)
Agreed; bug fixes to be back-patched have appeared in most CFs, and I think the CF process and app have served them fine. -- Noah Misch EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
