On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 11:25 PM Josh Berkus wrote:
> Amit,
>
> > I think, the decision of name, we can leave to committer with below
> > possibilities,
> > as it is very difficult to build consensus on any particular name.
> >
> > Auto.conf
> > System.auto.conf
> > Postgresql.auto.conf
> > Persistent.auto.conf
>
> Reasons for "auto.conf" as a choice above all of the previous:
>
> 1) short
> 2) significantly different from "postgresql.conf"
What is the advantage to keep name significantly different from
"postgresql.conf",
rather will it be not helpful for use if it is similar to
"postgresql.conf"?
> 3) near the beginning of the alphabet, so it should sort near the top
> if
> there are other files in conf/ directory
How would user correlate auto.conf contains configuration parameters set by
Alter System command?
I had kept persistent.auto.conf based on suggestion in this thread that user
can easily correlate it with
SET PERSISTENT command.
So based on that theory I think it would be better to name it as
System.auto.conf or Postgresql.auto.conf
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
