* Tatsuo Ishii (is...@postgresql.org) wrote:
> Yeah, at first I thought using WAL was a good idea.  However I realized
> that the problem using WAL is we cannot backup unlogged tables because
> they are not written to WAL.

Unlogged tables are also nuked on recovery, so I'm not sure why you
think an incremental backup would help..  If you're recovering (even
from a simple crash), unlogged tables are going to go away.

Put simply, unlogged tables should not be used for any data you care
about, period.

        Thanks,

                Stephen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to