> New submission which put long options in alphabetical order, which seems > more logical. > > This is for reference to the next commitfest.
When I applied your patch appeared the following messages: $ patch -p1 < /tmp/pgbench-longopts.patch patching file contrib/pgbench/pgbench.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 2109 (offset 29 lines). patching file doc/src/sgml/pgbench.sgml Hunk #2 succeeded at 172 (offset 12 lines). Hunk #3 FAILED at 170. Hunk #4 succeeded at 193 (offset 11 lines). Hunk #5 FAILED at 199. Hunk #13 succeeded at 344 (offset -33 lines). Hunk #14 succeeded at 367 (offset -33 lines). Hunk #15 succeeded at 382 (offset -33 lines). Hunk #16 succeeded at 395 (offset -33 lines). Hunk #17 succeeded at 407 (offset -33 lines). Hunk #18 succeeded at 422 (offset -33 lines). Hunk #19 succeeded at 432 (offset -33 lines). Hunk #20 succeeded at 442 (offset -33 lines). Hunk #21 succeeded at 454 (offset -33 lines). 2 out of 24 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file doc/src/sgml/pgbench.sgml.rej Please fix that and re-send the patch. Regards, ----- -- FabrÃzio de Royes Mello Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL >> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com >> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/PATCH-add-long-options-to-pgbench-submission-1-tp5754115p5760039.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
