On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 20:34 -0400, Josh Kupershmidt wrote: > This patch is in the current CommitFest, does it still need to be > reviewed? If so, I notice that the version in pgfoundry's CVS is > rather different than the version the patch seems to have been built > against (presumably the pg_filedump-9.2.0.tar.gz release), and > conflicts in several places with cvs tip.
Oh, thank you. After browsing the CVS repo failed, I just made the diff against 9.2.0. I'll rebase it. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers