On 06/25/2013 10:46 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > Not sure. Seems like it might be a way to spend a lot of effort without > achieving all that much. But I can also imagine that it feels nice and > encourages a casual reviewer/contributor. > > So it's either b) or c). Although I'd perhaps exclude regular > contributors to keep the list reasonable?
Well, one of the other "prizes" which occurred to me today would be a pgCon lottery. That is, each review posted by a non-committer would go in a hat, and in February we would draw one who would get a free registration and airfare to pgCon. Seems apropos and without the horrible logistics issues of mailing tshirts to 15 countries. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
