Hello 2013/6/27 Andrew Gierth <and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk>: > Tom Lane said: >> Agreed, separating out the function-call-with-trailing-declaration >> syntaxes so they aren't considered in FROM and index_elem seems like >> the best compromise. >> >> If we do that for window function OVER clauses as well, can we make >> OVER less reserved? > > Yes. > > At least, I tried it with both OVER and FILTER unreserved and there > were no grammar conflicts (and I didn't have to do anything fancy to > avoid them), and it passed regression with the exception of the > changed error message for window functions in the from-clause. > > So is this the final decision on how to proceed? It seems good to me, > and I can work with David to get it done. >
Isn't dangerous do OVER unreserved keyword?? Regards Pavel > -- > Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad) > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
