Hi, On 2013-06-28 23:03:22 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Did we decide against specifying huge pages in Postgres?
I don't think so. We need somebody to make some last modifications to the patch though and Christian doesn't seem to have the time atm. I think the bigger memory (size of the per process page table) and #cpus (number of pg backends => number of page tables allocated) the more imporant it gets to implement this. We already can spend gigabytes of memory on those on big systems. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
