On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:04 AM, James Sewell <james.sew...@lisasoft.com>wrote:
> Hey Peter,
>
> You are correct, it is the same as the referrals option in pam_ldap. It's
> also the -C (sometimes -R - it seems ldapsearch options are pretty
> non-standard) option in ldapsearch.
>
> As far as I'm aware you can't pass this in an LDAP URL, primarily because
> this never gets sent to the LDAP server. The server always returns an LDIF
> with inline references, this just determines if you chase them client side
> or just list them as is.
>
> I could be missing something here, but using:
>
> ldapreferrals={0|1}
>
> Would require a three state type, as we need a way of not interfering with
> the library defaults? To 'enable' the new behavior here using a boolean you
> would need to set ldapreferrals=false - which with the normal way of
> dealing with config booleans would alter the default behavior if the option
> was not specified.
>
> How do you feel about:
>
> ldapdisablereferrals=(0|1)
>
>
I agree with Peter that the negative thing is bad. l don't see the problem,
really. If you don't specify it, you rely on library defaults. If you do
specify it, we lock it to that setting. I don't see the need to
specifically have a setting to rely on library defaults - just remove it
from the line and you get that.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
